The Conspirator Movie Review

I loved the movie! I would give it 4 out of 5 stars.

To me it showed more of the human side of the assassination than any book that I have read. It didn’t just focus on John Wilkes Booth and the race to find him. It didn’t focus on making him the only traitor in the story. It focused on the other individuals who chose to work with him and his plot to kill President Lincoln.

It was very interesting to see the way Mary Surratt was portrayed. Not as the boarding house owner that knowingly housed Booth and the others prior to the assassination attempts, but as a woman who was completely in the dark about what was happening under her own roof and with her own son (who by the way, got away with being a member of the group and let his mother hang in his stead).

To me the beginning of the movie was very gripping, I mean really, when you lead off with the assassination, it is hard to top that. The end was just as gripping, with the public hanging and then the reappearance of John Surratt.

The hanging was difficult to watch, but I think Redford missed some of the historical parts associated with the hanging. In the movie, all of the conspirators seem to die instantly, like you are supposed to when you are hung. That is not quite what happened. One of the conspirators kicked and moved until the hood covering his face was thrown off.

I understand why Redford or the studio waited to release it on the date they did (the 146th anniversary of Lincoln’s assassination, but for the actors involved, I think it ruined their chances of getting recognition for their efforts in bringing these characters to life.

Advertisements

, , , , , ,

  1. #1 by Mark on 28, April 2011 - 1:25 pm

    Conspirator ended by telling us that the US Supreme Court ruled that American citizens can not be tried in military courts, only in civilian courts; an obvious ba-bee ba-boe statement about Guatanamo Bay. This ruling is irrelavent to Guatanamo Bay because those detainees are not American citizens. An appropriate Gitmo ruling to share in The Conspirators would have been that of the Geneva Conventions allowing of summary executions of non-uniformed combatants. Mary Surrat – and John Wilkes Booth – was a non-uniformed combatant in that she was an accessory after the fact in her refusal to cooperate with federal athorities trying to locate her son who was an obvious conspirator. No notice of that Geneva Convention ruling appeared in The Conspirator. Can one give a movie a rating of negative stars?

    • #2 by klar4230 on 28, April 2011 - 1:46 pm

      You are almost 100 years ahead of yourself Mark. The Geneva Convention treaties were not ratified until 1949 and have nothing to do with both the movie and the Lincoln conspirators.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: